🔗 Share this article

Jilly Cooper, who died suddenly at the 88 years of age, achieved sales of eleven million books of her assorted sweeping books over her half-century writing career. Beloved by every sensible person over a certain age (forty-five), she was presented to a new generation last year with the TV adaptation of Rivals.

The Rutshire Chronicles

Devoted fans would have wanted to view the Rutshire chronicles in sequence: beginning with Riders, first published in the mid-80s, in which the infamous Rupert Campbell-Black, cad, heartbreaker, equestrian, is debuts. But that’s a side note – what was notable about seeing Rivals as a binge-watch was how effectively Cooper’s world had stood the test of time. The chronicles encapsulated the 1980s: the broad shoulders and bubble skirts; the fixation on status; the upper class looking down on the ostentatious newly wealthy, both ignoring everyone else while they quibbled about how room-temperature their bubbly was; the gender dynamics, with harassment and assault so routine they were almost characters in their own right, a pair you could rely on to move the plot along.

While Cooper might have inhabited this era totally, she was never the classic fish not noticing the ocean because it’s all around. She had a empathy and an perceptive wisdom that you maybe wouldn’t guess from listening to her speak. All her creations, from the canine to the equine to her parents to her French exchange’s brother, was always “completely delightful” – unless, that is, they were “completely exquisite”. People got harassed and more in Cooper’s work, but that was never OK – it’s surprising how tolerated it is in many supposedly sophisticated books of the period.

Background and Behavior

She was well-to-do, which for all intents and purposes meant that her father had to work for a living, but she’d have described the strata more by their customs. The middle classes anxiously contemplated about every little detail, all the time – what society might think, mostly – and the upper classes didn’t care a … well “nonsense”. She was spicy, at times extremely, but her prose was never vulgar.

She’d narrate her upbringing in idyllic language: “Father went to the war and Mummy was terribly, terribly worried”. They were both absolutely stunning, participating in a eternal partnership, and this Cooper mirrored in her own marriage, to a publisher of war books, Leo Cooper. She was in her mid-twenties, he was 27, the union wasn’t smooth sailing (he was a philanderer), but she was consistently at ease giving people the secret for a happy marriage, which is creaking bed springs but (key insight), they’re creaking with all the laughter. He never read her books – he picked up Prudence once, when he had flu, and said it made him feel more ill. She didn’t mind, and said it was returned: she wouldn’t be spotted reading battle accounts.

Forever keep a notebook – it’s very challenging, when you’re mid-twenties, to recollect what being 24 felt like

Initial Novels

Prudence (the late 70s) was the fifth installment in the Romance novels, which began with Emily in 1975. If you approached Cooper in reverse, having started in Rutshire, the initial books, alternatively called “those ones named after posh girls” – also Octavia and Harriet – were near misses, every hero feeling like a trial version for Campbell-Black, every main character a little bit drippy. Plus, line for line (I can't verify statistically), there wasn't the same quantity of sex in them. They were a bit reserved on issues of modesty, women always being anxious that men would think they’re promiscuous, men saying ridiculous comments about why they preferred virgins (similarly, seemingly, as a genuine guy always wants to be the initial to unseal a container of coffee). I don’t know if I’d suggest reading these stories at a impressionable age. I thought for a while that that is what affluent individuals actually believed.

They were, however, incredibly tightly written, high-functioning romances, which is much harder than it appears. You felt Harriet’s unwanted pregnancy, Bella’s annoying relatives, Emily’s Scottish isolation – Cooper could take you from an desperate moment to a jackpot of the heart, and you could not ever, even in the beginning, identify how she did it. Suddenly you’d be laughing at her highly specific descriptions of the bed linen, the next you’d have emotional response and uncertainty how they appeared.

Literary Guidance

Inquired how to be a writer, Cooper frequently advised the kind of thing that Ernest Hemingway would have said, if he could have been arsed to guide a beginner: utilize all all of your faculties, say how things aromatic and seemed and heard and touched and flavored – it greatly improves the prose. But likely more helpful was: “Forever keep a diary – it’s very hard, when you’re mid-twenties, to recollect what being 24 felt like.” That’s one of the primary realizations you notice, in the more detailed, more populated books, which have numerous female leads rather than just one lead, all with decidedly aristocratic names, unless they’re from the US, in which case they’re called a simple moniker. Even an generational gap of several years, between two sisters, between a gentleman and a female, you can perceive in the speech.

The Lost Manuscript

The historical account of Riders was so exactly characteristically Cooper it might not have been real, except it certainly was factual because London’s Evening Standard published a notice about it at the time: she finished the entire draft in the early 70s, long before the Romances, brought it into the city center and forgot it on a vehicle. Some detail has been intentionally omitted of this anecdote – what, for example, was so important in the urban area that you would leave the sole version of your manuscript on a public transport, which is not that far from forgetting your child on a railway? Certainly an rendezvous, but what kind?

Cooper was prone to exaggerate her own disorder and ineptitude